
Priciples for dimensioning
Technical Details
View tables
| Type of support | Situation | Anchorage system |
|---|---|---|
| Plinth or intermediate support | Wall length < 3 m and corners | Angle-bracket anchors |
| Plinth or intermediate support | Wall length > 3 m | Single-bracket anchors |
| Lintel header (visible) | Width of opening < 2,01 m | Angled supports |
| Lintel header (visible) | Width of opening < 2,01 m | Angle-bracket anchors |
| Lintel header (concealed) | Masonry height < 0,5 m | Single-bracket anchor type EK-G |
| Lintel header (concealed) | Width of opening < 2,51 m | MOSO perforated strips |
| Masonry height > 0,42 m | ||
| Lintel header (concealed) | Width of opening > 2,51 m | Angle-bracket anchors with wire binders |
| Lintel header (with prefabricated lintel facing) | Attachment for prefabricated parts or laid on | |
| (*) This table is intended as a basic recommendation. Since we can provide planning and production from a single source, we are able to perform a cost-benefit analysis even during the project planning phase in order to submit the best possible quotation for you. | ||
| Attachment system | Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|
| Anchor rail, cemented into the cast-in-place concrete | Rapid assembly of the supporting structures | Higher material costs, early planning required, dimensionally accurate cast-in-place work |
| Officially approved dowels, retroactively | Dowels an be set immediatly before assembling the support, lower material costs | Assembly times are longer due to the need to drill owel holes |
| (*) As a rule, we ercommend that our customers use dowels, as experience has shown that they meet more effectively with the practical conditions prevailing on site. | ||
| Calculation of the resultant anchoring force R: | ||
|---|---|---|
![]() |




